The New York nursing home undercount
New York published a nursing home death toll that excluded residents who died after transfer to hospital. The Attorney General found the real figure was about twice as high. The administration's own aide said the data had been held back.
Why this verdict
Confirmed by the New York Attorney General's own audit, which found the state Health Department had undercounted care-home resident deaths by roughly half, and by a senior aide's recorded admission that data was withheld.
- Period
- Region
- Reading time
- Sources
01The claim
That the administration of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo undercounted deaths of nursing home residents during the first wave of COVID-19, and withheld the true figures from the legislature and the public, in order to limit scrutiny of a March 2020 directive requiring care homes to admit patients who had tested positive.
02Where it came from
On 25 March 2020, with hospital capacity the dominant fear, the New York State Department of Health directed that nursing homes could not refuse admission or readmission solely on the basis of a confirmed or suspected COVID-19 diagnosis. Similar policies existed in other states. As deaths mounted, the department published resident death counts that were noticeably lower than comparable states, and continued to do so while declining legislative requests for the underlying data.
03What the record shows
✓ CONFIRMED — It happened. The documents exist.
The undercount was a definitional choice with a measurable effect. The published figure counted residents who died in the facility and excluded those who died after being transferred to a hospital — a category that, in a respiratory pandemic in a frail population, is large.
Attorney General Letitia James's office reported in January 2021 after auditing a sample of facilities and comparing their records with the department's published counts. Its finding was that deaths of nursing home residents were undercounted by approximately fifty per cent. The department revised its figures upward within days of the report, which is the strongest available confirmation.
The concealment element is on the record from inside. In February 2021, in a call with state legislators that was recorded and reported, the governor's secretary Melissa DeRosa said the administration had delayed responding to a legislative request because of concern about how the numbers would be used, referring to a federal inquiry. The administration's position was that it had prioritised a Department of Justice request; legislators characterised it as withholding.
What the evidence does not establish, and this entry does not assert, is that the March directive caused a specific number of deaths. Studies have reached differing conclusions, and community transmission and staff movement between facilities are confounders that no state's data cleanly separates. The confirmed conspiracy here is the count and its concealment, not a settled causal claim about the policy.
04What it cost
The report contributed to the collapse of Cuomo's position and to his resignation later that year on separate grounds. New York enacted reporting requirements that make the definitional trick unavailable in future. The broader damage was to the usability of pandemic data at exactly the moment it was needed: once one large state's counts were shown to have been assembled to a favourable definition, every state's counts became arguable, including the honest ones.